R55Max
Auto-translated
To Lider1—to be honest, I agree with you on many things, but I still have some questions:
1. For you personally, are all the new features found in VT absolutely unacceptable for implementation into SoD?
2. Why do you call certain new features from VT "VT-style"? After all, essentially they could be called "SoD-style" if they had been implemented into SoD before VT. Wouldn't it be simpler to treat them as just new features? Even HD, with its own additions in SoD, is somehow fitting in—quite organically at the moment.
Perhaps it would be more reasonable to discuss each point in detail rather than acting impulsively and rejecting all ideas? After all, some of them contain a grain of truth.
1. For you personally, are all the new features found in VT absolutely unacceptable for implementation into SoD?
2. Why do you call certain new features from VT "VT-style"? After all, essentially they could be called "SoD-style" if they had been implemented into SoD before VT. Wouldn't it be simpler to treat them as just new features? Even HD, with its own additions in SoD, is somehow fitting in—quite organically at the moment.
Perhaps it would be more reasonable to discuss each point in detail rather than acting impulsively and rejecting all ideas? After all, some of them contain a grain of truth.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...