Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Thank you for the link. The report you mentioned accurately reflects the perception of newcomers about this wonderful new world as just another standard map. This statement is absolutely incorrect. If you play a few times, and even more attentively, even against the AI, you will notice that the initial position doesn't determine the winner. Only in THIS map do completely different rules apply, not the ones mentioned in the report, for example. And, as you rightly noted, the map is "unbalanced." The point is to be able to play at an expert level on a specific map, to use any opportunities the terrain offers, and to exploit your own advantages and the weaknesses of your opponent. (You have no idea how much the map differs tactically and strategically from your standard random maps, where two opponents with equal starting conditions simply butt heads like rams. Although, I personally have nothing against "your rules" - there's no accounting for taste.) (Also, the report doesn't mention what level the AI is playing at. Here, they are playing at 200%.)
Meanwhile, there are those who want to play under the conditions mentioned in this thread. If random people like you kept quiet, there would be more participants. As Oscar Wilde said: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."