Skip to content
User Avatar
#2170
Auto-translated
oelm
Yes, yes, it’s better to go with the flow and never be responsible for anything in life.

On the contrary, acknowledging certain patterns of the material world means acknowledging that you will have to be responsible for all the actions you have taken in the past.
Flandre
Of course, it’s better; it’s so simple to blame all your problems on fate!

Going with the flow is undoubtedly easier for some time, but the result is deplorable. Attempts to attribute something to chance are attempts to relieve oneself of responsibility for the result. And acknowledging a pattern is acknowledging oneself as guilty (acknowledging oneself as the cause) of a particular result (joy or disappointment). That is, acknowledging that you will have to be responsible for every action.

Fate is the totality of all possible paths of a person’s life development (in other words, these are the ripe fruits of karma, that is, what you earned in the past, that is what you are getting now (the law of justice). Fate develops depending on the actions, desires, and choices we have made in the past.

If a person experiences any “suffering” (discomfort, bad mood because, for example, the angels in the stash “accidentally” spoiled more than he expected), then the reason lies in his past, that is, he is to blame himself. Is this an attempt to attribute something to fate? Fate is the consequence – of a person’s virtuous and sinful deeds committed in the past. And in this case, the angels are not spoiling because the person should experience disappointment, frustration – and he should experience disappointment because he himself once caused suffering to someone in the form of disappointment. That is, he is to blame himself. Fate is the consequence of a person’s past actions. These actions naturally are the cause of certain events in our present (down to such details as whether or not the angels are spoiling).

Acknowledging that everything in this material world happens according to certain patterns, that is, acknowledging that only the person himself is to blame for what is happening to him – is this irresponsibility, an attempt to blame something on someone else?

When I said that such is fate, that it is destined to receive joy or disappointment, I meant that the person is to blame for this himself, that the cause of this is the actions he himself committed in the past (virtuous or sinful).
Nobody is to blame but himself.

I apologize if I offended anyone or caused anxiety by what I wrote
Дурман мирской любви сильнее яда кобры, он глупым может сделать мудреца и увести от цели благородной и дух и волю война храбреца.
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации