Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The complete lack of response to the draft regulations is concerning.
In it, I tried to take into account all the expressed points of view and divide the tournament into two parts: a game in two groups with strict rules, a schedule, and deadlines - and an Olympic part, in which there will be complete freedom in choosing maps, etc.
I also divided the participants into groups. Here, I tried to follow two principles: an even distribution based on playing strength and minimizing clashes in the group round between players from the same region. In principle, it worked.
I ask the participants and organizers to decide and, by tomorrow, either make proposals to change the regulations or accept them. Should silence be considered a sign of agreement?