Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Heh, people often write about gameplay, especially inexperienced players, saying that you need to play using archers. After my recent games, I've been thinking about this a lot. Even the Wanderer, for example, praises monks and always carries ballistas. Maybe I'm just not very good at the game, but still...
Let's analyze this using the example of 3.55 (enhanced version with levels 1-3 for all factions). Monks have 65 HP and some damage. There are no Angels or cavalry yet, so you have to fight with them. You need 5-7 of them. As it turns out, you need a lot of mana or wells along the way, especially if you need to get through without any losses (even a shield unit, which is essential). When you have enough mana for healing throughout the battle, as well as Bless spells, and a second mage can slow down the enemy's advance, then you can more or less survive. But as soon as you run out of mana, big problems start, and you often lose heroes - and that's at least a loss of tempo.
It's much easier to play with Crusaders - cast Regeneration and maybe Bless, and then just carefully watch the battle, not spending too much mana and keeping the mobs away from the heroes.
Ballistas are just too slow
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!