Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Thank you! Yes, the map layouts are random, but they are random for both players. We are not playing against a state or a casino where the odds are 75% against us. I am not advocating for the removal of restarts; mandatory restarts will remain, as they are necessary. However, subjective restarts, where one is allowed, and subsequent ones require payment, should be reconsidered. It's difficult to start with 6000 against an opponent with 14000 (let's say after 2 restarts), but that's not critical yet. But why pressure the Stronghold in the hope of getting a 50, and if it's 100 and it goes badly, take a restart? The game will simply be more balanced and cautious. If you want to play riskily, on the edge of adventure, go ahead; no one is stopping you, but the opponent shouldn't suffer because of it. If you choose a random map, you should play with a random strategy.