Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I wanted to move my suggestion to the rules discussion section, but I decided not to, because I think the reaction will be the same – zero. People want to believe that they will be luckier than their opponent when rolling dice, and no one will refuse the chance of getting an advantage, even if it's just a gamble, whether it benefits them or harms their opponent. Mandatory restarts are more than enough to ensure a normal, fair game. Subjective reasons, however, seem to contradict one of the main rules, namely fair play. What can you see on the map on the 2nd or 3rd day, after 15-20 minutes of pure game time? Nothing, except that you played poorly and made a lot of mistakes. But what does the opponent have to do with it? Imagine a situation in a card game, dominoes… (or even football, volleyball…) when the opponent asks for a rematch on the 2nd or 3rd turn because they don't like the way the game is starting. I think after the second or third such request, their face will swell from "shame," and eventually turn purple. Let this be a crude, incorrect comparison, but how does our game, our COMPETITIVE matches, and, in general, just a way to relax from everyday worries, differ from other games?