PINOCHET911
Auto-translated
That is, is it better to take, for example, War Machines instead of Shrieks? But Shrieks push the enemy hero back by 0.30 in terms of Attack Rating. So, against a Necromancer, you should take Attack, Leadership, Darkness Bane, Luck, and... what else? I'm starting to get interested myself – I'm currently playing a game with a Necromancer just to see how it goes – this topic has really caught my attention.
Added 3 minutes later
And Luck only gives a 15% chance to deflect an enemy spell, if you're lucky, not full-fledged protection like Defense does. And an Orc without magic resistance is easily wiped out. I'm completely stuck myself (
Added 8 minutes later
Yes, I'm talking about the FUNDAMENTAL factors of victory – because victory is the absence of defeat. And this isn't about "just useful" things. The game is against a Necromancer, and that's more dangerous than any mage because he turns your army into a bunch of weaklings. In my opinion, taking War Machines against a Necromancer is utter nonsense.
Added 30 minutes later
Yes, about giving the Orc magic resistance against a Necromancer – will he have enough mana for Shrieks to scare the Cyclops he's controlling?
Added 3 minutes later
And Luck only gives a 15% chance to deflect an enemy spell, if you're lucky, not full-fledged protection like Defense does. And an Orc without magic resistance is easily wiped out. I'm completely stuck myself (
Added 8 minutes later
Yes, I'm talking about the FUNDAMENTAL factors of victory – because victory is the absence of defeat. And this isn't about "just useful" things. The game is against a Necromancer, and that's more dangerous than any mage because he turns your army into a bunch of weaklings. In my opinion, taking War Machines against a Necromancer is utter nonsense.
Added 30 minutes later
Yes, about giving the Orc magic resistance against a Necromancer – will he have enough mana for Shrieks to scare the Cyclops he's controlling?