Offline tournament "Evil Lands".

This new RULE is called:
"PROVE YOU AREN'T A CHEATER"
Writing a description is a VOLUNTARY task.
But making it so detailed forces the winner to PROVE something!

But how do you check the best result for a clean playthrough? The winner doesn't prove anything; they tell how they achieved such results! And if, after their explanation, none of the players who took 2nd and 3rd place in the tournament can repeat their playthrough, then there are two options: either they didn't tell everything, or they deliberately didn't. How can this be clarified without additional questioning? And if they cheated somewhere, even just a little bit :) The best way to check is to repeat the playthrough and achieve the same result.

And there's no need to just say that the player who took second place won't be able to do it if they have the right to ask the winner more detailed questions.

This measure should act as ARBITRATION when suspicions arise, BUT why provoke this function by making it a RULE.

I don't want to talk about this, but it seems I have to. And on what basis can you even suspect the leader? THIS MOMENT IS NOT REFLECTED IN YOUR RULES. Therefore, a smart cheater can hide the use of cheats by making the description confusing, which, according to you, is difficult to repeat :D Or they might not even provide a description at all, since, according to you, it's purely voluntary.

This is starting to look less like a TOURNAMENT and more like something else...
With these ideas, we are only ruining the entire atmosphere of the tournament and moving away from its entire ideology...:(:(:)

Stop talking nonsense, especially about ideology. The ideology of the tournament should be that an honest player doesn't take a prize-winning place.

Creating such a description for this tournament will not be particularly difficult, but creating the same detailed description for another tournament will already be a burden...

If you like to ride, you have to like to carry the sled!

The description is VERY LARGE, but after reading it, it will be almost impossible to repeat it.

What does "almost impossible" mean? I'm saying it's possible.

I DID NOT SET AND WILL NOT SET SUCH GOALS IN THE DESCRIPTION

Do you think a cheater will set such goals to provide a complete description? I'm not talking about you personally here, but about the cheater.

And you personally will set such goals for yourself, and so will any of us, if you happen to take 1st place and the rules require you to provide a sufficient description that can be used to repeat the playthrough, considering that the person repeating it will be a player of approximately the same skill level as the leader.

Speaking for myself, if I'm lucky enough to take 1st place somewhere, then if the 2nd or 3rd place wants to repeat/check, I will be ready to prove that I'm not a cheater. But how do you know if the person who doesn't want to prove it is a cheater or not? :D