Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Peter!
Time is short, so in a few words: "your hard work won't go to waste."
The fact that you organized a selection process in your situation deserves huge respect!
Let's say this: those who made it will have a separate quota in any future CIS tournament (whether it's based on enthusiasm or a real financial foundation) – the choice is theirs. At the same time, Dnipro still has a reserve selection process!... in my opinion, this is fair, and the organizers of the CIS tournament won't object :D
Now, about the financial aspect:
It all starts with intention.
Without it, nothing will happen.
And then reality puts everything in its place.
So, the intention is there!
I can dust off my old Sochi project: everything was developing dynamically there, but the partner wanted to make money off it (ON HEROES!!!). There's nothing wrong with that, but it showed a lack of ideological commitment, even though I was the one who had to do all the work – so I let him go.
Sochi was in 2014.
Perhaps a test run will happen even sooner.
I need to dust off the old documents ;)
Regarding the money, I repeat: don't draw conclusions without information.
You, Peter, don't have the information and can't have it, so all your statements about "balls" are absolutely unfounded.
There's a counter-argument to your sayings about the infamous "balls": "you count your chickens in the fall."
Good luck! :)
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"