wowa
Auto-translated
Vova, go to the garden yourself. Three organizers essentially started the dispute, and I don't understand why you're sticking your two cents in here – you're judging everyone based on yourself and drawing conclusions accordingly, while simultaneously complaining that you weren't asked about something. The logic is top-notch.
In general, your judgments clearly show a certain bias with a slightly veiled support for a specific side.
But no one is disputing anything anymore; all that's left is to vote to gather statistics on who will come and who won't, based on what has been proposed, and to try to be more careful with expressions so as not to exacerbate contradictions and disputes.
Petya! There's only one organizer – Eric!
Vik – the judge
Please, don't twist things.
Therefore, this isn't bias, but simply support for the organizers.
Who, by the way, are willing to accommodate everyone – but within certain limits, because reality isn't limitless.
And I don't see a third party – maybe you can enlighten me?
And about the complaints – where did you see them?
Or are you judging everyone based on yourself? :(
Are you, as an adult, familiar with the concept of rhetoric? ;)
P.S. If you consider Egypt to be the third party, then that's just not serious... it seemed like that issue was resolved a long time ago....)
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"
(с) Roger Zelazny
(с) Roger Zelazny
