Zingel
Auto-translated
I've said it several times before about my attitude towards descriptions. If I make it into the top three, I'll provide a more detailed one. Otherwise (if a player who isn't a leader provides a description), it's not particularly interesting. It's up to them – if someone wants to, let them write it.
Special attention should be paid to the description of the player who took first place. In the case where one of the leaders (2nd or 3rd place) wants to repeat the Walkthrough based on the winner's description, the leader should be required to provide complete information about the Walkthrough, in such detail that the person repeating it can actually FOLLOW THE WALKTHROUGH based on their description.
I'm emphasizing this especially because the leader's description, made available for everyone to see, might not be enough to repeat the Walkthrough.
I even suggest that you include this in the rules for running tournaments, so that requests to the leader for clarification on the Walkthrough are completely official. You have something similar in the rules, but it's a bit different; it only applies to players suspected of cheating. But why would we suspect the leader of cheating? And if a player simply wants to play the map following the winner's path – they can check it out at the same time :)
In my opinion, VDV_forever has already looked at the results and chose your save as the most interesting, or perhaps the best, or one of the best. That's why he's asking :)
Hmm, I sent my save in a bit too early. :(
Герои - это клёво.