Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Regarding the proposed rule changes, I believe that nothing should be changed. The rules already cover everything.
16. It is forbidden to reveal one's own/another player's role, or its elements, as well as any information obtained about it, in public places or among players who are not in the same group as you. The same applies to information about other players. Phrases like "well, I also know something about him that I can't say" are a violation, regardless of whether you actually know something or are lying. Statements like "I checked," "according to my information, which I cannot disclose," "I know for sure," etc., are prohibited. Unsubstantiated shouts like "he's MAFIA!" or "I'm INNOCENT!" are allowed. To avoid violating this rule, try to express your thoughts as assumptions or as an IMHO, based, for example, on clues or behavior. It is allowed to refer to the rules, the GM, your own posts, or the posts of other players, as well as to any external sources where you found information about the clues.
I have highlighted the key points.
That is, the current rules prohibit revealing elements of one's role. As I understand it, the elements of a role are its special abilities, role characteristics, and its status.
It doesn't matter whether the revelation is true or false.
Statements like "guys, I'm innocent!!! you'll make a huge mistake if you execute me" or "aaa, it's obvious, you're mafia!" are currently allowed by the rules.
Therefore, I believe that nothing needs to be changed, except perhaps to clearly define what constitutes the elements of a role.
The responsibility for enforcing this and other rules lies with the game master. In this situation, the game master decided that this violation did not warrant a modkill, so that is the case.
In fact, he considered the violation to be minor. And according to this rule, there should be no modkill for a single minor violation.
14. A modkill (in rare cases - a replacement) is performed: - in the case of a serious violation of the rules or a repeated minor violation;
If I were the GM, I would do exactly the same. I would limit myself to a warning.
Если эта надпись уменьшается - Ваш монитор уносят. :D