Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Read it more carefully. I could, of course, highlight the changed part, but it's better to read the entire rule to avoid missing its other nuances than to focus on just one thing, which could lead to questions and misunderstandings mentioned in other paragraphs of the rule.
However, I want to say this. For some reason, in all previous games, in a situation like:
"- I'm sure you have a negative reputation, and you're a villain!
- Oh, really? Well, let a kid check me today and post it in the newspaper, and you'll see that I don't have a negative reputation,"
which is essentially identical to our situation, no one was bothered by such a pseudo-revelation. Maybe Hossi felt more at ease back then?