Mafia 27. The problem of Bovblob residents

Yes, the standard psychology applies here: "Since we won by breaking the rules, why blame the rule-breaker?". It's a standard case of selfishness and a conscious attempt to avoid the unpleasantness of losing.

Host, this violation didn't really have much of an impact. Ara's words were still verified by Risunok (on the third night, the comparison of Mona and Kostyan was made when comparing Ara and Mona on the second night). That is, whether or not Ara's words were there, we learned his status. Is it a matter of trust? I didn't trust him until my last night, and I assumed he was a Mafia player putting on a good show. But by that time, he was simply behaving in a fairly peaceful manner; it wasn't about revealing his status. As for the selfishness, I've already written that I didn't like his action, but I'm only silent because the rules are poorly written.

16. It is forbidden to disclose your own/another player's role, or its elements, as well as information obtained about it, in public places or among players who are not in the same group as you. The same applies to information about other players. Phrases like "well, I also know something about him that I can't say" are a violation, regardless of whether you actually know something or are lying.
Statements such as "I checked," "according to my information, which I cannot disclose," "I know for sure," etc., are prohibited. Unsubstantiated shouts like "he's MAFIA!" or "I'm a Town member!" are allowed.
To avoid violations of this rule, try to express your thoughts as assumptions or as IMHO, based, for example, on clues or behavior.

With this wording, it's now impossible to prove that Ar was talking about "something" he knows, rather than simply making unsubstantiated claims like "I'm an outsider, there's no point in checking me." Yes, I didn't like his action, and that's why I played without taking his words about his status into account. And it's obvious that this is closer to "something," but the rules should prohibit everything clearly, not on the principle of "around and about." Stop trying to prove how bad Ar is; instead, to avoid similar situations in the future, come up with an improved version of this rule that will effectively prevent such cases.

Demanding a modkill for a player from the opposing team is a standard case of selfishness and a conscious attempt to avoid unnecessary problems.

Ar, aren't you tired of it? You can see that it only angers some of the other players. Just understand that others (and notice, not just the losers, but also me) don't like it, and don't use it in the future. Why make people even more angry?