Skip to content

Who thinks that an army is unnecessary?

User Avatar
#145
Auto-translated
Abroad, people often suffer from senility. Not long ago, in the UK, a person was deprived of their driver's license for driving a children's (!) electric car on their lawn, because they didn't have a license. Or, very recently, in the same UK, residents were banned from installing iron, sharp fences on their windows, explaining that potential burglars might get injured (!). So, don't bring up the West as an example, which is mired in senility in terms of correctness and tolerance. It's good that we haven't reached such idiocy yet.
1) Correct, it could have hurt someone.
2) They have a good police force, so a fence with spikes is not needed. And burglars should be punished by the court, not by vigilante justice with fences with spikes.
3) It's better to have such idiocy than our idiocy.
Because of this "stupid rabble" that went to war in 1941, you now have the opportunity to sit on the internet and enjoy life. The army is not needed to teach people how to peel potatoes and sweep the parade ground, but to ensure that a potential defender of the country, in the event of a war, can at least reload a rifle, not just in CS. It's another matter that the state of our army leaves much to be desired, but there is no other option. I hope that there are not many "mommy's boys" who will sell their country just to avoid serving in the army.
Back then, there were defenders, yes. Back then, there was a different army.
But now it's not the 20th century. THERE WILL BE NO WAR!
Rebellions like in Egypt are possible, but there will be NO WAR! There is no one to fight, there are much more useful things to do. Unless aliens attack...
А что я здесь делаю то?

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: leyu