Mafia 27. The problem of Bovblob residents

Gil was writing something there, like, "what's the point of sending a note if they already know about Charlie?" - an ill-considered phrase.

Perhaps the colored body is an indication of one of the unicorns. In that case, the note is essentially pointless, because Charlie is already known to the remaining unicorn.

By "pointless," I meant that it ALREADY has no meaning, since Charlie is already known to the remaining unicorn. I put forward the theory that Flandre was a unicorn 5 pages ago. And of course, since I think that way, I didn't use the existence of the note as such a ridiculous counter-argument to my theory. So, there's no need to immediately throw out phrases like "that's ill-considered."

I hope that in this game, no one will repeat the mistakes of the previous one, saying that the maniacs are now more useful to the city than they are harmful.

Exactly, in the last game, we already played around with the "maniac who is useful to the city" idea.

I'm not changing my vote, I don't see the point.
Hos, Ar, you were talking about a play that you wanted to put on in Mafia 26, but it failed because of Ar's checks? :D Could it be him? :D Well, for now, it's a bit boring and predictable, so, no, it's not him.