1st annual offline tournament "Best Of The Best"

AmberSoler and I are suggesting the same thing, aren't we?
You still don't understand:
One difficulty level - Impossible
And only 3 rewards.
Is that what he suggested?
I haven't heard anyone suggest only 3 rewards!!!

Comrade Prorock, why are you nitpicking? I don't see much difference between my suggestion and yours. It sounded something like this:
One difficulty level - MEDIUM (and this is only out of respect for weak players who find it difficult to play on Impossible). Three ORIGINAL rewards for the top three places. The remaining participants receive standard certificates as a keepsake. But we can also leave it as you suggest, only I think my suggestion is a little better. And AmberSoler was the first to point out the absurdity of five nominations. To be honest, I didn't want to get involved in the discussion at all; I won't mention the reason. But seeing how AmberSoler's reasonable suggestion is being dismissed, I couldn't resist. :)

And if you supposedly know what's going on on other portals, then PLEASE tell EVERYONE what's going on on other portals, what level they're playing at!?!

Listen, you supposedly. Since you've appointed yourself as the official assistant of VDV, please learn to address forum participants with "You" (formal). I'll report to you about what's happening on other portals later, after I finish ironing my socks. As if I didn't participate in tournaments on other portals. I may have played a little, but my results should still be in the tables - if you're interested, you can go and check what level they played at. I assure you, I played at the same difficulty level as all the other participants.

Added 16 minutes ago

Your question made me doubt my words, so I specifically rechecked the computer's resources. The following figures were obtained:
1. (80%) - 2/5/5000
...
5. (200%) - 7/15/10000
I think this is closer to the truth.

Probably. But I think that in previous posts, you correctly noted that the initial conditions of the OFF-line tournament are absolutely irrelevant; the main thing is that they are the SAME for all participants in the tournament. In my opinion, people stubbornly don't want to understand this, with a few exceptions. If there are players who doubt whether they can even pass on a difficult level, then I agree to play on an easy level if ALL players play on it (including the strong ones), what's the big deal.
The tournament will still objectively show the level of each player's game in relation to another. Two nominations, or even more so five, will not show anything, ESPECIALLY if they allow sending a save ONLY in ONE nomination. And if there is no objective assessment, then what is the point of the tournament, and who is really the Best of the Best?

Added 9 minutes ago

So how many nominations will there be????? I suggest one, and whether it's the most difficult or a little easier is not important. It's better to make one difficulty level 180%, it's not the most difficult, and the computer won't lag so much. Although, I'll reveal a small secret - there are resources on the map. So, you can even make it 200%.

This guy is thinking clearly! I'm giving him a plus :)