Once I thought it through, it means I had planned in advance and intended to accuse you, right?
You wrote about drug addicts, and I just repeated about drugs. I haven't read the book and can't know what was in it. So I don't understand why you accused me of writing about drugs, and not about opium.
Of course, when accusing a specific player, I considered possible responses, escape routes, and excuses. I tried to address them immediately to avoid pointless demagoguery. Don't tell me that it would be more logical not to think it through, but to write randomly. And I intended to accuse you – well, when I directly linked it to you, who else should I have intended to accuse? Myself? :D
Okay, you didn't read it, so you didn't read it. It's not important to you. I just said that it can't be a coincidence.
I have to go now, good night. Think, vote. :)
