Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You're wrong. The probability that a serial killer will end up in the Mafia is lower than if they were in the Town. In theory, if you don't execute the Mafia, then you execute the serial killer. That would be better than a Nuclear Winter.
I already insisted on this in Mafia game #23, and I reiterate - the Seer also wants to win, they calculate who the Mafia are, and try to kill them... Besides, Seers often play "for the Town" - if that's how you can put it. But if someone insists strongly, I can reveal the clues I have on the serial killer, as I see them. But then the chance that the Mafia will kill him, and there will be no way to stop them - is almost 100%. I still think the Seer is useful for the Town...
Can I be a little bit capricious in the style of Neyra?
I don't know what you mean :rolleyes:, but probably. I was just voicing all the versions that came to my mind... Is that bad? Or too unbelievable?
Если тебе не везёт в жизни, - играй в какую-нибудь другую игру:rolleyes: Лидер клана "Из многих единое" Приключения – это сплошные неприятности, только про них почему-то потом интересно вспоминать...