Academy of Sciences of Heroesland

Of course, some scientific inaccuracies are permissible, but the implication is that in the future, something will be discovered that we don't know now. For example, I can't imagine how one could travel at superluminal speed, and that doesn't bother me. However, in the film in question, the focus isn't on unknown technologies, but on the increasing stupidity of viewers who are willing to swallow the most absurd ideas. That's what causes so much dissatisfaction. In my opinion, this is a disrespectful attitude towards the audience to some extent.
In the film "Pandorum," there's a similar psychological story with a captain who has gone mad (in fact, "Pandorum" is the name of the disease). However, the film doesn't seem contrived or depressing, and here's why.
- The film uses abstract, paranatural concepts (hyperson, superluminal speed, panspermia). And if, for example, the film states that the Earth was destroyed, it doesn't say HOW. It simply says , and the details aren't important – the viewer will come up with a satisfactory explanation, and on the other hand, this adds variability to the plot.
Furthermore, the scientific theory underlying the film's plot plays an important role: time and space travel = 5, the origin of life in the universe = 5, bombing the sun with nuclear bombs = 3.