Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I apologize, but I'll try to clarify your question.
Lordesat, Morning wrote that it's a noob approach, but that doesn't mean you're a noob. IMHO.
He called it a noob approach because usually, not-so-good players (maybe noobs) play with those factions that are easiest to play. But if you're already good at playing with one faction and not so good with another, you can play with the second one to get more enjoyment from the challenge. In this case, the more challenging, the more interesting it is to play. For example, when I started, I played more with Paladins and Rangers because it was easier (at least that's what I thought), but now I play with Druids, Wizards, and Clerics. It's harder to play with a Druid than with a Ranger, but that's where the fun lies, if you're no longer a beginner in this game.