Journey

Yes, I haven't used scenarios like this before, but okay, thanks to the author. But next time, IMHO, the scenario should be more or less understandable.

You're welcome too. There isn't a scenario on the map as such. The map isn't a scenario map. The manual recommends reading the hints. The hint near Andragor says: Fully trust all of Andragor's actions + the rumors in the taverns are the same, meaning that whatever Andragor does to your hero, it will be for the best.
Zoltan's special ability is only for the ritual. ;)
The Pyramid of Cheops shouldn't function without the quest, because you refused it ;) (it's like you returned the keys to it when you didn't want to visit).
You can change the name of Zoltan on the strategy screen, but I didn't, because the names might be the same (Misha, Petya, etc.).
The Green Outpost only protects against entry. It shouldn't protect against exit.
Since the map has no scenario, and it is recommended to read the hints, they provide all the clues. (Our predecessor was good, and left them for us). The map was designed so that the player analyzes the information himself and then draws conclusions. And not that the conclusion is already ready, and we just have to execute it.
Soon (in a month or two), a map will be released that will be very difficult to complete without a clear head. Ignorance or misunderstanding, incorrect logical reasoning, and "frustration" - when you start playing it wrong - all of this breaks the player. But all the conclusions can be made in advance, or even saving and loading is still an option. ;) But all the warnings, as in this map, will be there, because there is enough information, so it shouldn't be made more understandable.
P.S.
I personally like maps where the gameplay is ambiguous and unconventional. But there aren't many of them, or they aren't quite like that. :( In principle, it's understandable why... People need a simple and clear path...