P.S. But what is a "косa"?
Allow me to disagree with you;) .
1. Yes, to some extent you are right — a fundamentally small pile of resources won't make a difference:) , but 10000 gold quite possibly will!..
I don't mind! As long as the participants are happy! If there were 10 difficulty levels, I would reward 10 people!
Firstly, if you were to propose right now giving a certificate to every second tournament participant — you would simply reduce its value to zero :) This is not a situation where the more, the merrier...
Secondly, how do you envision, for example, rewarding a single participant on the second difficulty level? What is the point of such a reward? It's all the same to you, but the "winner," I think, would feel awkward and resentful about wasted time, because such an award would also hold no special meaning for them... I am proceeding from the fact that currently, on average, no more than three or four people are registered per nomination.
By the way, it would be a good idea to indicate in advance, along with the application, who will play on which difficulty level. Why make a secret out of this? For instance, I would like to play on the fifth... But what if no one else wants to? Then I will play where there are more opponents... And if there is a risk of playing for nothing, is it even worth playing at all?..
After all, we're not playing for a certificate... :D
The only reason to hide this information would be to try to register for the nomination with fewer opponents — but then why even join the tournament at all? :)
We don't want to do the same thing as on other internet resources!
But! As they say, "When in Rome, do as the Romans do..." you know the rest yourself :)
We'll play — and we'll see! I eagerly await the start. Good luck to you and all the tournament participants!
