What perversion? I wasn't joking. Get used to playing without auto-saves — otherwise, you'll never actually learn how to play... What kind of growth as a player is possible if your mindset is "I'll just lose and that's fine" because almost everyone gives autos? And I won't even mention the textbook breakdown in bracers after the Dragon Utopia — Neverminder just showed an example of how to handle such cases, for which he has my sincere respect. Even when losing everything, there are options: when did the loss occur (116-17, for example, and there are prospects with a good build-up on the 2nd — why the hell are you begging for an auto or surrendering?)? Where is the opponent, how are they showing activity (if not at all — why surrender?)? etc. We are playing on-line, not off-line, after all ;) .
Growth should happen when you lose like that. Never already pulled a stunt like that with me ) But back then he was a bit luckier; he had mana and a ballista or something. And "I'll just lose and that's fine" is exactly about him too )) Otherwise, of course, one should try to play without autos, but I personally often make small mistakes that ultimately cost me the game... On the other hand, I don't sit there calculating damage for every slightly significant battle, which saves my opponent's time. I think an auto might be deserved for that :) It would even be fun to introduce it as a rule ))) 1 auto per person. People aren't robots, after all. And ending games with total losses isn't profitable for anyone
