Christ didn't charge money for healing; he preached by example. That's why people believed him. But modern priests are not trustworthy.

Those were different times; everything has changed now. Besides, just because someone has a Mercedes doesn't mean they have a lot of money. In families like mine, the system is roughly like this: save for a long time, and then buy a good item. For example: I used to have an old Pentium 1, which didn't even have internet. We saved for three months, then realized that with that salary, we wouldn't save enough for at least another 10 years. So, we took out a loan from a bank, bought a good computer (an Athlon or something like that), and then paid off the loan over six months. We finished paying it off in August. That's normal, right? This is what they call "we don't have enough money to buy cheap things." The rich buy a new mobile phone every week (figuratively speaking); they don't have to worry about it. It's more likely that the priest was given the car as a gift. After all, not only middle-class and low-income people go to church. Some bring fresh tomatoes from their garden, and some give cars as gifts. Parishioners are a grateful people. There was a case with our Temple when some businessman donated... I don't remember how much, but it was a lot. In other respects, I agree.