Almost every season it's the same thing.

As for zloy_romantik, to avoid repetition, read here: /topic/at/385763/; there are links there.

In the comments on the permanent rating at the end of spring, I wrote:

Naturally, its objectivity is more relevant for those players who have played more games in these one and a half years. Unfortunately, I don’t have statistics on the number of games played. There are also many "ghost accounts" there.

Yes, we need to include the number of games played in the permanent ranking table. I will try to do this by the end of winter.

I-86, Stinger-87 :D. Doesn't anyone think that something needs to be changed with this rating system, because it doesn't even remotely reflect the real state of affairs?:smile18:

But how can anything be changed if Stinger now mainly plays poker? And didn't he appear on HW only occasionally before? Should we include RP-2 games from past years? Or should we include a player in the rating by looking at some save file? How can we add Danish player Maretti to our rating if he isn't even registered on the site? He actually plays very often and could easily be near the top.
Dream tried to create a Unified Rating for the Runet, but it requires all players to post all their games there. That's why it failed.

... I think you should take into account your opponent’s rating when calculating the rating...

The formulas are in the Rules. This is taken into account. You get significantly more points for winning against a player with a higher rating than for winning against an underdog.