Skip to content

Technomancer race.

User Avatar
#10
Auto-translated
Mugais;43620
There are some interesting ideas. But it seems we are talking about different dwarves. The ones I was talking about have an innate talent for illusion magic.


Yep, definitely different ones. Everyone has their own ideas. But personally, I can't quite picture dwarves as magicians and illusionists, sorry. It just seems absurd.

Or Crushers. A complex unit, in a bad way. Because a normal melee attack means the unit moves towards the target and attacks it. A Crusher has to crush, that is, occupy the cell where the enemy is standing. But if it just moves up and attacks the enemy, it will look ridiculous. And ignoring defensive moats, etc. - because not all of them are physical barriers, for example, the Dungeon has magical wall protection.

Now I've looked at everything again, and golems really seem like an uninteresting idea to me, as they are just another humanoid among the many humanoids in the castle. But there are such wonderful beetles and wasps : )

As for the workers, purely considering the history and embodiment of the race, since most members of the race have a tendency towards work, machines, invention, and creation, why not embody a corresponding unit in reality? That's how they turned out, not very combat-oriented, but active and repair units.
Tengro;43623

I think the borrowings and lack of originality are in the golems, galleys, workers, and ballista.

You still have a slight plagiarism phobia : )

Golems. Well, they are golems. A popular race in fantasy, distinguished by its artificial origin.

Galleys. A flying ship. There are plenty of them in fantasy and anime.

Workers. Where is the plagiarism here? From the social classes of the fifteenth century? ) Actually, I already talked about them above.

Ballista. It's like a medieval turret with a gnome pilot inside, shooting large-caliber arrows. Apart from some similarity to a ballista, I don't remember seeing it anywhere else. But to call any similarity plagiarism - isn't that a bit much?
Tengro;43623

In what sense, can it MISS???))

I was speaking figuratively, saying that many arrows rain down on the enemy, but some miss. In fact, it is characteristic for archers, or rather for the fired arrow, to miss ; )