Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”
Most people haven't expressed a unified opinion. For example, I haven't heard a single argument why the Grail should be banned. Someone takes Wings for a horde of wood, someone gets 3 Griffin Conservatories for 9 Angels at their native respawn, and someone digs for the Grail. Why not? Why make the game poorer? I don't think the Grail introduces any huge imbalance into the game, especially on a resource where many play on a SM (small) map, on which there has never been balance. If the problem is about trust, then I don't see a problem at all :) : don't play with those you don't trust, and that's that. There are, however, towns in which building the Grail gives a huge advantage (Tower and Conflux), so building it can be banned in those. In the others, besides 5k per day and +50% growth, the bonuses are fairly insignificant. And with the Soda bug, you can easily peek at the town's income; you'll need not only to dig up the Grail, but also to hold the town in order to extract profit from it. In short, it's a fresh vein in the game; I think it should be tried out for at least 1 season.