Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Leader1, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
Wlk feels quite comfortable with his 400 points, and he doesn't hesitate to openly send, for example, Redwait packing. Knowing that it's unlikely any moderator will take responsibility and ban him for it. But that's wrong. It's not good to use foul language in a public place, and it should be punished.
And I can't give his opponents a yellow card – I'm not giving it to him for the same thing. That would be unfair :smile27:. I gave Sam 50 points for direct insults, and recently I gave Oelm 25. I managed to hold back and only give the Samurai 5, because he's already on the verge of a ban. The others didn't behave any worse than Wlk. If I can't punish him, how will I punish them?
A "permanent" ban is earned by going through several preventative measures, I think that's logical. Wlk has already deserved it several times. I will award points for insults and foul language; it's part of my duties as a moderator. Try to change the auto-ban system and/or write letters to the Creator.