Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Leader, that was a funny joke. Ha-ha.
The real issue is this: VODs usually show fragments of gameplay. That is, a player like Numone, Stinger, or someone else makes moves, conducts battles, sometimes with commentary. But what does this give to someone who wants to learn how to play the game? They won't be able to understand why certain moves are made (usually 80% of the decisions are off-screen, and only 20% are commented on). When analyzing a save file, you're essentially playing along with the author, you can watch, evaluate, criticize, and ultimately play better. But with a VOD, if it turns out that placing bears was successful, it means you should always place bears when playing as Crag. Leader, are you talking about that? Or are you playing so well that you can judge whether I'm playing too slowly or too quickly?
If you want, watching Barcelona or, say, Ronaldo play football won't be enough to learn how to play. So, I have a similar attitude towards VODs. It's like watching a game of Barcelona, Manchester United, or the Tom team.
That's why I don't make evaluations based on videos, as the most important aspects often don't make it into them.