Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It's precisely protection from negative effects that's needed, and protection from positive effects is complete nonsense—although this was done for balance (they are already the strongest creatures in the castles in terms of stats in the 4th game).
And hives, poisonous creatures, ghosts, jellyfish, thunderbirds... shall I continue? And phoenixes, ifrits, and other fire creatures attack with fire, and phoenixes have 50% immunity to fire, so this is the best way to fight against Black Dragons.
Well, yes, they are dark; what else should they be, cheerful? Definitely not. I don't know; everyone has their own opinion; I think the demons were drawn very well; I don't think they can be darker than the Necropolis (the two factions are very different in terms of color scheme). And they are more vile than dark.
I was just saying that only Warlocks deal magic damage to Black Dragons.
Not just in the 4th game. Aren't Black Dragons "weak creatures" in the 5th game?
As far as I know, all units in the 5th game deal physical damage. There's no fire damage at all. Or am I wrong?
They shouldn't be cheerful, of course; the demons really turned out well. But even the dogs are too dark.
Победитель
