Мафия 22. Corpus Delicti.

The Majerson mafia is together with Azey, apparently :p
He got worried about the suicide note (there are different rules everywhere, by the way!) He immediately voted against Azey (and started defending himself)... in general, it wasn't convincing! :rolleyes:

Please, indicate at least one mafia game with such investigations where there are notes. Otherwise, it's just empty words. I didn't understand at all why he was worried. or I did, you're just checking how things are.)

I suggest hanging Azey and the new detective should shoot Medzh :D

Just like in the 15th mafia game, when I hanged Cash-the-priest and suggested the priest go to someone. :)

{about Azey} Why reveal yourself without thinking? What if, for example, he's a new accomplice?

So? Who else underestimates Neira's intuition? And she has such "coincidences" in every game.

I admit, at the beginning, I thought about executing Deriel, I thought he had revealed himself. And only expressing trust without accusations is a common tactic for the mafia; they know who the town members are. But now I looked at this post and I think:

If I were a town member, I wouldn't kill Ara, as I consider him useful for communication, which undoubtedly adds interest to the game. If I were a mafia member, I wouldn't kill Reg either, as I don't have the habit of eliminating strong players at the beginning of the game.

I don't think he's lying so blatantly. So, at most, he's a low-ranking mafia member whose opinion wasn't asked. Or a town member.

my main question to Medzh: "why Lizarde???"

And why not. ;)
I was planning to vote for Ara, but he was unfortunately killed. I had to quickly look for a new candidate (there wasn't much time). I didn't find any talkative players, but one single, insignificant post about squirrels raised suspicion - it looks like a mafia member trying not to reveal himself. although I almost didn't care who I voted for. The main thing is to vote with the town. Because the town needs INFORMATION. A blue vote is practically nothing. But a red vote is serious information. Think for yourselves how it can be used; the main thing is that there is a lot of it.
Moreover, I wrote that I would return. I returned and withdrew my vote. And I had a specific goal. At a minimum - to check the reaction. At most - I won't say.)))

Added 6 minutes ago
Host, if you allow, I would like to talk to you. About this long post.

A simple town member, by revealing himself as a town member, loses the opportunity to cover up the role of the town and thus becomes simply a means of manipulation for one of the sides until the end of the game.

Record it as a negative, I don't want to answer. Personal preferences that indicate mafia members (especially with some kind of setup) can be a reason for a visit from a bad guy with a garrote.

For some reason, I didn't see this question in relation to Medzh and his vote against Lizarde... I'm paranoid, I didn't like Medzh's post, intuitively.

Gur was on the forum today. Let's hope for a save.

I agree with all of this.

An adequate negative will try to make others believe him. Because such trust gives him ways to manipulate the actions of the town + saves him from visits from town investigators + he can only be killed by a serial killer.

The doctor's move is justified by the main instinct - the instinct of self-preservation. I don't think there's anything to dig into here. And the doctor could have been blocked without any problems.

I already talked about the doctor.
But I don't think that's the case with trust. Town members also need trust. Think about it, if no one trusts you, then the whole town will execute you.
The main thing is that you only trust town members. If you're not sure, you feel that the person you're talking to is a mafia member, don't trust him.