Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Hello everyone. It's possible that in a group of 6 strong players, the 5-6 players who don't make it through (as suggested above) might be significantly better than 1-2 of the weaker players who do. That also seems unfair. I think it would be better to distribute the strong players across different groups. But first, we need a named registration system. I'm still deciding whether or not to participate, so I'm observing for now. Maybe, after learning the rules and the number of players and groups, I'll feel more inclined to join. But in my opinion, it's better to extend the tournament, starting later, but gathering a larger number of high-quality and numerous participants, rather than rushing it with whoever is available. Sometimes I can play a couple of games a week, and sometimes I don't play for two weeks, and then I get kicked out.