Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”
One option is to define violations, where a Player's transgression would not result in a technical defeat.
The second option is that for any violation of the rules, the winning side (which committed the violation) receives a technical defeat (unless the losing side agrees to annul the match), provided, of course, that the losing side raises the issue of sanctions.
In my opinion, the second option is preferable because, otherwise, there are prohibitions, but they don't mean anything. Why even write them down then?