Auto-translated
One option is to define violations, where a Player's transgression would not result in a technical defeat.
The second option is that for any violation of the rules, the winning side (which committed the violation) receives a technical defeat (unless the losing side agrees to annul the match), provided, of course, that the losing side raises the issue of sanctions.
In my opinion, the second option is preferable because, otherwise, there are prohibitions, but they don't mean anything. Why even write them down then?