Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”
For players who enjoy nitpicking the rules when losing and searching for minor, formal violations in their opponent's actions that had no impact on the game, and for judges like Pavel Dubrovin, who believe that such claims are valid and justified, I suggest adding a prominent text in red at the top of the rules: "Players' claims of rule violations that did not affect the course of the game may be rejected by the judges (at their discretion)," or something similar.