Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Well, let's not talk about fairness. Everyone has their own idea of what it is. For example, I would easily give an auto-win in a fun game, but I would think about it in a tournament.
And why shouldn't the referee count such a win? :confused: If the referee had to review every report and approve/reject it, it would be a nightmare. The referee should count the game if there were no protests, and if there were, then he should sort it out.
Everyone has their own opinion. But Dubrovin very easily and quickly counts my non-game losses and also easily rejects game wins, justifying it with some of my words that he understands in his own way. Wicc was right – it's better not to participate in tournaments judged by Dubrovin. If, for example, FB-4 judges again and I get there, I will have to withdraw, even though it's a pity. IMHO.