Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Actually, Antonag07 isn't entirely correct here. If the subjugation doesn't fail, we'll end up with this: . This role-playing scenario seems quite reasonable, and the size of the Orc army is the same as in the replay that Mdance posted. The only difference is that the Knight is properly leveled up here. And there was no need to re-apply the subjugation. This suggests that if you ensure the Knight has decent magic skills, you don't need to worry about things like magic resistance or spell power. Therefore, in the replay, the Knight loses 2 stacks – angels and griffins, but doesn't lose any Knights, while the Orc loses cyclops, chieftains, shamans, and goblins. Consequently, I have mixed feelings about this tactic – on the one hand, it's the best the Orc can offer, but on the other hand, it doesn't guarantee 100% success.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день