Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What, was there no Battle of Agincourt in Earth's history? And yet, the French cavalry was thoroughly defeated at that time precisely due to the skillful use of archers...
Once a year, even a blind pig finds an acorn. You understand that citing a single battle out of thousands, especially under such circumstances, is incorrect and does not affect the statistics. Also, remember Vasya from 7B, who pinned a single stack of hippos to the edge of the map with a force field and shot them down.
Regarding tactics
Typical archer tactic. It is very easily countered; just hit a small group of warriors with AoE abilities. And even more elegantly – blind, teleport, air shield, or dispel – there are many options. And that's how your fragile "fighters" got wrecked. The money spent on buying archer upgrades was not worth it.
Here's a video proving the indispensability of archers in a battle with neutrals!
Yes, the video shows good uses for an overpowered hero with a full set of artifacts and many useful spells in his spellbook, a great hero for munchkin-style gameplay in the campaign.
It's a pity that the entire "Heroes" series is poor in tactics; something started to take shape only in the fifth installment. I want as many options as possible, but given the current trend of casualizing all released games, I don't particularly hope for that.