Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
In a long game, it's worth taking "Soldier's Luck" – if only because it can't be replaced by any artifacts or buildings. Regarding the Princes – "Soldier's Luck" affects the probability of the Princes' "Stun" ability triggering. This has been proven for a long time.
Because of just one "Soldier's Luck," it's not rational to occupy an entire luck slot with it. Especially in a long game, when each skill slot is literally worth its weight in gold when upgrading skills. This is only if you really have no artifacts, no utopias, or corresponding buildings – then yes. And what does "Soldier's Luck" give? It only affects the triggering of two abilities in a Necromancer's army – stunning skeletons, and if we believe what Antonag07 said – the percentage of blinding vampires. And even in the latter case, "Soldier's Luck" may have an effect, but it's barely noticeable. At least, vampire princes blind quite well even without it.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день