Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Really? How is “confidence in fair play” measured? My poll: /topic/7053/ showed that 80% of players are willing to give Vitalik a second chance. Another poll: /topic/7143/ showed that only 56.76% believe player bRitvo4kA. The remaining 43.24% are confident in his dishonesty. So now, including Andrey in the Tournaments – is this disrespecting these 43%? Which of these players should I refuse registration to so that my reputation doesn't suffer?
There’s no need to complicate things; there is a special body – the AK (Arbitration Committee) – and almost 100% of players voted for its legitimacy. The Champion title isn’t given out just like that; it’s awarded after careful and thorough consideration. I simply don’t understand this childish behavior with Vitalik, especially from such kind people as Dubrovin, who first vote for the Champion title, then for a "second chance," and then fight against allowing Champions into tournaments, even though they themselves essentially voted for it. Enough is enough. No, gentlemen, it’s time to end this childishness, stop stressing each other out and the Creator, let’s act like adults: if you receive the Champion title, goodbye, no second chances or concessions. Most of the AK and players consider the player innocent – no questions asked; those who don’t trust him can choose not to play with him; the tournament organizer has the right not to accept any player of their choice. P.S. By the way, at one time, NO ONE voted in favor of Vitalik’s honesty – compared to this, 56% for Britva is VERY high.