Poll regarding changes to the AK regulations.

But formally, there's nothing wrong, so I'm definitely voting "yes."

Formally, maybe not, but in reality, it is. Firstly, it creates a legal precedent that the AK has the right to dictate something to independent organizers. Even if it's a minor issue, the fact itself is important. Ordinary citizens are usually unaware of such nuances, but in the world of big politics, such details can derail negotiations on serious issues. Because experienced politicians know that "constant dripping wears away the stone," and you need to fiercely defend every inch of your territory (geographical, diplomatic, legal, etc.), otherwise, you will be consumed over time. Secondly, Dubrovin is blatantly boosting his own reputation. So that later he can proudly say, "90% of my proposals were approved by the forum, and who are you?" People won't remember that 80% of these proposals were trivial, like this one, and real initiatives were approved in only half of the cases. Such manipulation of statistics is also actively used in big politics. Ordinary people believe in the magic of numbers. And thirdly, this is why I wrote my first post, which was maliciously deleted by Loy. By the way, there was no off-topic content. Everything was very relevant. It was just a humorous way of presenting it; I was already tired of the pointless arguments in the evening. For those who didn't get to read it, I'll remind you that I suggested adding a few new options to the vote, reflecting indifference or negativity towards the very fact of this vote. The idea is that flooding the forum with votes is not a good thing in itself. Therefore, people who voted "yes" indirectly supported Dubrovin's initiative and gave him more enthusiasm to come up with new and new votes. But if, say, they had collectively ignored it, he would have thought about whether it was worth coming up with such nonsense again.