Poll regarding changes to the AK regulations.

Organizers accepting players who have received a "Champion of Champions" title into their tournament and not removing those who receive it during the tournament severely undermines the tournament's and their own credibility. IMHO=[/QUOTE] Yes, but ultimately, it should be up to the organizer to decide whether or not to accept them. In my opinion, having a "Champion of Champions" title should simply indicate that there was cheating, and whether or not to play against them should be a personal decision for everyone... After all, it could be that someone is given a "Champion of Champions" title, but someone disagrees with the Arbitration Committee's decision and wants to play against them for rating. I think that the decision to play or not, to include them in the tournament or not, should ultimately be up to each individual, regardless of the "Champion of Champions" title.

Added after 4 minutes
What's the point of the "Champion of Champions" title then? Because even without it, you can simply not include them in tournaments, not protect rating games, and consider tournaments where they participate to be invalid. I'm against it... In my opinion, it's purely informational. You could, of course, prohibit "Champion of Champions" title holders from playing against each other so they don't inflate their rating.