Анализ игры Oelm-KillerVampire

They are trying to heal me, as well as other players. The idea that going into the darkness to level up a weak hero is completely normal, and even a positive move.

Dear friend, as they say in Russian, if you think a move is negative, then call it positive. Where should I send a weak hero to level up if not to the Necropolis? To a dead-end dungeon? It's open to all winds, and the surroundings are practically unexplored. But the Necropolis's surroundings are well-scouted; you can only get to it through a lift that leads to a dead-end corner dungeon, so it's unlikely that an enemy will be there. It's the perfect place to level up.

No, dear friends, if this is a positive move, then I don't understand anything about Heroes.

It seems that way. Especially considering that you consider the Blade's move to be positive.

But to prove this, please provide an example from your own games or other people's games where this trick is used.

Oh, come on, it happens all the time. In the late game, you constantly need teleporters, jumpers, runners, etc. They are usually leveled up like this: you give them an army and send them to all sorts of remote places to gain experience and, at the same time, collect various goodies that you haven't had time to get.

The main point of my reasoning is this: the game for the blue side is structured in such a way that if you need Conservatories, you find Conservatories. If you need Utopias, you find Utopias. If you need scrolls, you find scrolls. If you need control, you find control; if you need resources, you find Cyclops dwellings. All of this is practically without scouting. And without mistakes. Playing up to 133 with four heroes. Rushing and exposing myself to DD (which doesn't exist) many times. And having a very weak endgame.
The problem is the dissonance.

There are certainly grounds for suspicion, there's no denying that. I myself initially thought that there was obvious cheating going on.

But then, by examining screenshot after screenshot, I realized that there is a logical explanation for everything, to some extent. And I couldn't find any situations where it was obvious that an honest player couldn't have played that way, where no matter how you look at it, you can't come up with a reasonable argument for the actions taken. That's why I took the position of a defense attorney, hoping that maybe you would find something. But instead, you're pouting and saying all sorts of nasty things. That's not very dignified, comrade.