Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Don't you think it would be better not to leave, but instead choose an organizational structure on Volde (as I understand, the main concern is resolving controversial situations) that would satisfy (in your opinion) the majority of Volde players? Everything is in our hands, the hands of Volde players.
An intellectual majority, under conditions of true democracy, always has an advantage. That is why, within the framework of true democracy, serious issues (such as choosing the organizational and legal form of interaction) are not resolved. Because it is quite difficult to do if the votes of Vlk and Oelma are equated to the votes of Stinger, Forrest, Neo, Ketch, etc.
Therefore, true democracy exists only for the amusement of the public and to satisfy its complexes. It's a well-known fact, repeatedly noted by many famous politicians.
In addition, much depends on the personalities of the comrades with positive karma. Because, due to the presence of this very positive karma, they usually claim to have more weight in decision-making than their level of development allows. If this weight is significant in itself, then it's fine, but if not, then...