Because if there are no "boyars" at the helm, or if there are too few of them, a so-called "paralysis of power" occurs. This, by the way, strongly resembles the general atmosphere in the Guild – the desire to appear harmless and well-intentioned, to play it safe, to avoid difficult decisions, to sit it out in the hope that things will resolve themselves, to wait for someone else to make the decision, and so on.
Yura, it is a fact that the Guild Council (AK) of Vold is elected by the Players of Vold from among the Players of Vold.
It is also a fact that the election mechanism for the Guild Council is transparent and cannot be considered bad, since almost every Player of Vold can gain the right to vote, not to mention the fact that an even wider circle of people can become members of the Guild Council.
The Players of Vold themselves determine the organization of the Guild.
No one is saying that the decisions of the Guild Council are perfect.
But we all have a way to change the organization of the decision-making process for resolving controversial situations in the Guild.
If the Players of Vold believe that it would be better if controversial situations were:
- considered by everyone and resolved by a general vote – that is what will happen;
- left to the Tournament judges to make the decision – that is what will happen.
It is enough to simply choose the most suitable mechanism for the Guild through a general vote.
The last vote showed that the Guild still needs a Guild Council.
Nothing is eternal; next time, there may be a new mechanism for resolving controversial situations.
Everything depends on the Players of Vold themselves, and no one is imposing any particular point of view on them. The Players of Vold themselves determine and decide what mechanism the Guild needs to resolve controversial situations at the present time.
And also, the Guild Council makes a decision on each case, does not avoid making decisions, and very rarely does it take a long time to make a decision; usually, it is made promptly.
