Regarding skill: I understand when Alex writes that Britva, Dubrovin, or I, for example, don't know how to play Heroes. But imho, most of the players who "evaluated" Andrey's skill actually play worse than him, and I wouldn't rule out significantly worse. I have no intention of idealizing his game; in general, I'd like to avoid evaluating skill as it is a thankless task. Two examples (though of course for many this isn't an indicator at all). In an old balanced game with me, both played for quite a while practically with an open map, exchanged Castles, then there were long maneuvers; I'll say that he created quite a few problems for me. I lost the game due to my own mistake, but nevertheless. The last game on VT without anything, Andrey was streaming, taking the utopia on 126 as Barbarians. I understand that these are not deciding arguments, of course, but in my opinion, even this would be an achievement for many.

2Wic: your argumentation at this moment is simple and depressing simultaneously. I am right because I am right. It's useless to prove anything here, and I have no desire to do so on the forum.

In a conversation and discussion of one save from Britva's game with his Barbarians, I still haven't received a proper answer to a simple question...
For 3 days he circled with 3 heroes near the lookout and only at the end of the 3rd turn opened it. A very interesting and logical move)))

Look Rom, why not just post the saves? Theoretically, such a situation is entirely possible.

Regarding quoting myself:
1. I apologized to Valenok.
2. Such a stream of nonsense started in the thread that I decided "not to keep my mouth shut," thinking it would be better and more honest. Along the way, I had to reconsider many of my views on some Heroes players, the situation with Vitalik, and there was other stuff too. The reason:

But the accusation looked weak, or rather, there wasn't one at all. No one accused anyone in the course of the process, didn't you notice, gentlemen?