Discussion about the Britvachka-Valenok party.

To have arguments for the defense, there need to be arguments for the prosecution. I'm looking for them like Diogenes, with a torch in broad daylight, but they are being hidden from me. Kash, you probably saw the controversial episode in the Kebazavr - Britva match. There, no one considered Keb's actions suspicious. I feel the same way. Although, for me, there is an undeniable similarity in these game situations. Maybe you find Vik's position well-argued? He presented it in three points: 1. Andrey cheated in this match. 2. Andrey cheats systematically. 3. Andrey cannot be cured of cheating. 3. - As you probably noticed, we have all these highly qualified psychiatrists with experience and practice here. Maybe we can create a society of anonymous cheaters on the forum. We could invite Vik as the leading specialist. 2. To talk about systematic cheating, as I understand it, evidence and an analysis of at least three matches are needed. Where are they? Sam writes that there may have been a maphack in the match with Alex. Where are the arguments? Vigo writes that Andrey cheated in the match with him, and repeatedly. But again, where are the facts? Write to me in a private message, for example. 1. I have already presented arguments that were considered nonsense. But it is not considered nonsense to reason that - I don't like this person because of his character traits, so he is definitely a cheater.