Discussion about the Britvachka-Valenok party.

Such evidence is a death sentence for the very idea of the Anti-Cheat system, and for the Anti-Cheat system itself. It seems Vic was not as biased as I thought. Moreover, could this be a settling of personal scores by some members of the Anti-Cheat system? We await the named votes of the highly respected Anti-Cheat system.

Dear OELM, temper your enthusiasm. Don't judge someone else's virtual bias; try to keep your own under control. If the Anti-Cheat system is not needed, time and the course of events will show it, but for now, keep your heated opinions to yourself. It is impossible to please every such hothead; there will always be complaints and dissatisfaction based on their own subjective opinion. If you can't see beyond your own nose, at least don't try to convince everyone else of it. This poll has several goals, but not everyone sees them. 1. Finding the truth - is it cheating or not? 2. Identifying similar cases, other controversial situations involving Andrey (I repeat, there are grounds for this). 3. Preventing such cases. Moreover, the third point is no less important, if not more so. Your votes are both opinions and witnesses at the same time. The result of this vote, and indeed its progress, will be very important in making decisions on other controversial situations. Up to the point of "should it even be held at all, because there will always be troublemakers who will turn the process into a mess." Did I explain it clearly enough?