Oelm
Auto-translated
It is unethical to seek the truth by discussing the reputation of other players. If this is normal for some, it is not for me. It is irrelevant and uninteresting.
Recently, there was a review of a game by Keba-Britva. Without knowing the map, I made the same move as Keba and found the same Pandora's Box with control (which caused all the fuss). Here, I didn't play a single game, but I'm sure I would have taken that Utopia as well. So, what is there to talk about?
Is there even one player at RP's level who would say that playing as Blue raises suspicions?
By the way, I realized: why was the AK even formed? It seems to me that it (and not in vain are the best players chosen for it) should build arguments for and against, and if it cannot do so itself, it should turn to the "top" players. And only then should we, the forum residents, decide whether their arguments deserve attention and hold a vote.
But as always, everything is done the wrong way.
P.S. If no serious arguments appear, this will be my last post in this thread.
Recently, there was a review of a game by Keba-Britva. Without knowing the map, I made the same move as Keba and found the same Pandora's Box with control (which caused all the fuss). Here, I didn't play a single game, but I'm sure I would have taken that Utopia as well. So, what is there to talk about?
Is there even one player at RP's level who would say that playing as Blue raises suspicions?
By the way, I realized: why was the AK even formed? It seems to me that it (and not in vain are the best players chosen for it) should build arguments for and against, and if it cannot do so itself, it should turn to the "top" players. And only then should we, the forum residents, decide whether their arguments deserve attention and hold a vote.
But as always, everything is done the wrong way.
P.S. If no serious arguments appear, this will be my last post in this thread.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.